The Goal Problem in the 'Now What' Problem

In this discussion note, I argue that the philosophers who propose solutions to 'now what' problem for error theory typically face a goal problem. The has its root in argument they back up their proposal with, which is one of instrumental reason, consisting two premises. First, we as normal agents have certain set goals; second, with goals instrumentally should accept proposal. when specify sufficient detail so second premise comes out true, first will most likely come false. These could retreat conditional solution, but cost solution being less non-trivial; instead, may try establish truth premise, requires empirical investigation no armchair speculation suffice.